PostfixAdmin 3.0

CBlog

Sonntag, 11. September 2016

Geschrieben von Christian Boltz in english, Linux, PHP um 23:43 | Kommentare (2) | Trackback (1)

PostfixAdmin 3.0

I just released the long awaited PostfixAdmin 3.0.

Right. there isn't a beta label anymore :-) It's more than two years since we released the first beta for 3.0 (and even more years of working towards 3.0 - I started working on the PFAHandler class in 2011) so I think we can safely drop the beta label.

PostfixAdmin 3.0 is now officially the stable version of PostfixAdmin. I'll keep the 2.3 branch maintained for a while if someone finds critical or security bugs, but nevertheless it's probably a good idea to upgrade to 3.0 whenever you have some time.

See the official announcement for details and the changelog, and my PostfixAdmin 3.0 slides (which still wear the beta label) for a quick overview of PostfixAdmin and what's new in 3.0.

BTW: I already submitted PostfixAdmin 3.0 to openSUSE Tumbleweed and Leap 42.2. It will arrive there as soon as the submit requests get accepted.

Tags für diesen Artikel: mail, php, postfixadmin

Trackbacks

Trackback-URL für diesen Eintrag

techrights.org am : PingBack

Kommentare

Ansicht der Kommentare: (Linear | Verschachtelt)

Oliver am :

Hi Christian

First of all, thanks for postfixadmin.
I am just adding some functionality but could need some help as my php skills are not that great (i am java programmer).
Could you answer me: the PFAHandler class, is this for mapping db fields ? Can i use this also for just model logic (no ui) ?
Maybe you can tell me if this is totally wrong and PFAHandler does not handle that or is not designed for that, or if this is the way to go:
https://gitlab.com/olze/PostfixAdmin/commit/c56eaf9eac8ff0b63782fef93927eb8275d9e5d7

thanks!

Christian Boltz am :

The *Handler classes basically map between database and user interface (read and write mode, including error checking etc.). Nobody forces you to actually display the results, so "no ui" (and only using the results in the code) isn't a problem.

Note: I only had a quick look at your code (and it's not too readable in the diff mode in your link), so I won't comment on your code ;-)

Kommentar schreiben

Name

E-Mail

Homepage

Kommentar

Antwort zu

Umschließende Sterne heben ein Wort hervor (*wort*), per _wort_ kann ein Wort unterstrichen werden.

Die angegebene E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht dargestellt, sondern nur für eventuelle Benachrichtigungen verwendet.

Um maschinelle und automatische Übertragung von Spamkommentaren zu verhindern, bitte die Zeichenfolge im dargestellten Bild in der Eingabemaske eintragen. Nur wenn die Zeichenfolge richtig eingegeben wurde, kann der Kommentar angenommen werden. Bitte beachten Sie, dass Ihr Browser Cookies unterstützen muss, um dieses Verfahren anzuwenden.
CAPTCHA